83 Comments
User's avatar
Ancient Warrior's avatar

1. Your feelings do not trump the rights of others to publish. It is freedom of speech and that alone is reason enough to I clue reason #2.

2. Read #1 again.

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

Ancient Warrior fighting for freedom; define freedom; particularity, the part where your right takes away my freedom to be??? That part in particular...

Expand full comment
Ancient Warrior's avatar

"My right takes away your freedom to be?"

What right are you talking about exactly? If it takes away your freedom it isn't a right now is it?

To "be" what exactly?

Want to "be" a murderer? (Example)

Go ahead and try. Society, and especially nature, has consequences for every action.

Expand full comment
Gary Beaumier's avatar

I abhor anything that feeds the hate machine.

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

words that marry into a soliloquy; speak the loudest when heard...

Expand full comment
Ro mcnamee's avatar

Crazy and sad!

Expand full comment
Lisa Tea's avatar

Thank you for sharing this important information. Shared on my platforms as well. #SubstackPayAttention

Expand full comment
Mark Marshall's avatar

Do you oppose Communists on substack? Hmmm?

Expand full comment
Tara Giancaspro's avatar

Fuck no.

Expand full comment
Jonathan Ramsay's avatar

Why not? They are two branches of the same poisonous tree.

Expand full comment
S.A.M.'s avatar

No because communism is jewish

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

LOL; ok I will be your huckleberry; please in brief, explain. You will be massaging an individual whom does not blame a race, country or its people for the actions of others. I am fully aware that there are two sides. One side wants it all and they have slowly controlled the world via a slow warm embrace. The hungry side controls many race, country, people...but it is not the people. And if we are moving towards, "we are the chosen". We are all the numbers; you can be a nine/constant as much as the next...allow me to expand on that. God is the numbers witches manipulate; 666 anyone can use but they have you convinced that gods numbers are only for them. A gun can be used for evil...

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

...do you believe, for even one moment, he is now the only one who can use it???

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

And if you do, did he tell you that so you would not shoot back???

Expand full comment
i love you's avatar

ok, great

first of all, i’d just like to say that i find lots of stuff offensive and disgusting

and i’d love to deplatform everything i hate

but we need to be logical here

so, to start out with

what kind of impartial, logically coherent rules do you think we should adopt ?

Expand full comment
Tara Giancaspro's avatar

More content moderation is the easy first step? A defined and public list of standards for hate speech and then a content team to monitor for these.

Expand full comment
i love you's avatar

that's a great idea

we could ban everyone who hates joe biden and donald trump

we could ban everyone who hates capitalism and communism

we could ban everyone who hates israel and hamas

i'm sick and tired of all this hate speech

Expand full comment
Tara Giancaspro's avatar

That’s not hate speech. Hate speech is, as I’m sure you know, inciting violence especially towards marginalized groups.

Expand full comment
i love you's avatar

well, there are a lot of people who disagree with you - elon calls that phrase “hate speech” and i think a few university presidents are about to be fired because someone thinks that phrase is “hate speech” - - and congress just passed a “resolution” declaring

WASHINGTON ( JTA) — The U.S. House of Representatives approved a nonbinding resolution saying that anti-Zionism is antisemitism, with support from all but one Republican and a substantial

Expand full comment
Tara Giancaspro's avatar

I can’t take a damn thing Elon says seriously, though. No one should.

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

I agree100%. That male is in charge of the worlds filthiest industry.

Expand full comment
i love you's avatar

sure, it's just an example of "hate speech" as defined by a moderator of one of the most popular social media platforms

Expand full comment
i love you's avatar

“from the river to the sea”

you mean like this ?

Expand full comment
Tara Giancaspro's avatar

I'm not seeing a call against a marginalized group. (Israelis, many to whom I am related, are not a marginalized group. Jews may be, and as a Jew I do not condone antisemitism at all.)

Expand full comment
i love you's avatar

well, there are a lot of people who disagree with you - elon calls that phrase “hate speech” and i think a few university presidents are about to be fired because someone thinks that phrase is “hate speech” - - and congress just passed a “resolution” declaring

WASHINGTON ( JTA) — The U.S. House of Representatives approved a nonbinding resolution saying that anti-Zionism is antisemitism, with support from all but one Republican and a substantial

Expand full comment
Ancient Warrior's avatar

I hate logic and reason so let's deplatform logical and reasonable people. Why not?

Expand full comment
i love you's avatar

those logical idiots have no respect for authority and tradition !!!!

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Mar 29, 2024
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Ancient Warrior's avatar

The sarcasm went over your head.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Dec 16, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

they certainly are blind to what is truly going on...

Expand full comment
i love you's avatar

awesome vid

Expand full comment
Jonathan Ramsay's avatar

Who gets to set the rules?

Expand full comment
Ancient Warrior's avatar

Me.

Rule 1. We don't talk about the rules

Rule 2. We don't talk about the rules

Rule 3. Rules are for measuring

Rule 4. I rule

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

block anything that removes any form of humanity...start there...

Expand full comment
Martin - Vetenskapliga partiet's avatar

Know your Nazi! All who voted for the ice cream munching pedophile are Nazis, because he's supporting Nazis in Ukraine. The military industrial complex loves that these Nazis began bombarding ukrainian civilians in Donbass 2014, who later voted to belong to Russia because of it. All presidential candidates standing behind Israel are Nazis, RFK JR too, because the Israel regime is a racist Nazi regime committing mass murder. General Ya'ir Golan of the Israeli Defense Forces warned Israeli people about it. The majority of Israel kept voting Nazi anyway. The ones voting Nazi, or did too little against them, probably often got their punishment. https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/meanwhile-in-israel-8-year-old-vaccine Yehovah [God] works in mysterious ways and is truly great.

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

I would like to add that we have to stop hating on the people of a country because of the nato cabal that controls it; i did not vote trudeau in...

Expand full comment
Martin - Vetenskapliga partiet's avatar

Did you support and vote for a better person?

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

Careful; in a manipulated system/world, did anyone vote in anyone??? I want all to wake up. The King created a system to control; it is an illusion. He is assured to stay in power. Other than the fact, that they all swear to "it", he put in a guarantee. No one can vote against the system. There is and never has been a NO Vote; just a yes...how many missed that??? Perhaps because we allow crap to be said???

Expand full comment
Martin - Vetenskapliga partiet's avatar

Untrue. The problem is that people watch lying media, and lying platforms, and are voting for bastards, because they do not want to wake up and smell the coffee. As soon as they become true, unlike you, they can choose more wisely, and change the system, into a real democracy with initiative rights and decisive referendums, like in Switzerland. You just vote for a change in the constitution, thus you can change the system. But with stupid people, blaming the system, instead of themselves, you cannot do anything. It is Self-fulfilling. Idiots voting for idiots, or idiots not voting for better people or not for themselves, because if they are intelligent enough to organize, they will form a broad election coalition.

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

Martin I truly appreciate your one line...or not for themselves...it says it all. If none of the candidates do it for us we should be able to vote for ourselves; if enough people vote for themselves then we justin created a new party. The truest of a peoples' party...nah CELEBRATION!!!

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

We are simpletons, we do the same thing over expecting a different result. I/3 of the population does not vote why??? 1/3 are forced top vote for a party at best, why??? because its a great system??? As per your word idiot; I would assume an idiot would make a suggestion that voting for a better person is the issue...

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

You wouldn't happen to have the lyrics??? Hard time hearing...

Expand full comment
Martin - Vetenskapliga partiet's avatar

Democracy's Broken

(Tune: Morning has broken)

https://tabs.ultimate-guitar.com/tab/cat-stevens-yusuf-islam/morning-has-broken-chords-84520

Democracy's Broken, and we gonna fix it!

People has woken, recovered the soul.

Vote for the winning!

Vote for the singing!

Vote for the springing thought of the whole!

Sweet is the new Call, heard now from people.

Like a big snowball, speed down the hill.

Vote for the sweetness, Powerful people!

Vote for completeness, when we all rule!

We have the right bite.

Direct Democracy.

United in one site.

United today.

Join the creation!

Join it willingly!

Our new Liberation

from the old way.

https://peacecompassionunderstanding.wordpress.com/2024/01/08/direct-democracy-songs-cc-by-sa/

Expand full comment
Diana Brewster's avatar

Slippery slope. The beauty of Substack is, if you don’t like what someone is saying, you need not hear their voice. Substack enables you to strenuously oppose disagreeable notions with your own stalwart argument and glowing presence. Your articulate expression of your beliefs, ideas about community, and peaceful demeanor will do more to sway minds than any jackbooted quashing of that which is toxic but alluring.

Myself, I see evil sprouting from every dank corner lately, like mushrooms. Foul ideas are like the walking dead: they will not die. They only wait for a prime opportunity to display their true colors. No, neither you nor I can destroy them. Light is the only antidote to darkness.

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

Gods reasoning; as it relates to nature; no argument. But we are discussing mankind...

Expand full comment
JB's avatar

Libs can't stand by while others speak freely. You either repeat the "narrative" or you speak hate and must be controlled.

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

Second thought; do on to others...

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

yes we are humans who absorb; we should be concerned with what that is; example what would happen if you allowed an entire group of satanists to infiltrate the world??? Best just accept right???

Expand full comment
Jason Holliman's avatar

You probably have no idea what a nazis really is. It’s just name calling at this point

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

The World Lite Only by Fire/The Greatest Story Never Told...if we are still fighting them they never lost. Something about the victor writes the history.

Expand full comment
PastoraCate's avatar

Hi Tara,

I have been reading more on this subject, and decided to remove the post from my channel for this reason: I am convinced that our readers are adults with the power to make up their own minds and apply common sense.

Yes, I hate what Nazis stand for. I'll never budge on that.

But free speech is something we cannot regain if we lose it, and this just feels like it could be a watershed issue for us.

I appreciate your effort, and I enjoy your substack.

Shalom,

Cate

Expand full comment
JB's avatar

You have learned a "first principle" of great value!

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

Pastor; the PulpitAugar here...you are the problem; you will not fight; this is not natural nature; this is mankind within nature, the same laws do not apply. Your words are pathetically passive; you are the mind set that if you kill a murderer you are a murderer; foolery...you would feed your children to a nazi and reason the nazi is just being a nazi...let it be...NOT ME!!! Your mind set is that of the predator; you offer excuse for perverts; lucky for your children. PS Shalom. PSS We all make our own choices, THAT MEANS WE ARE ALL THE CHOSEN.

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

the biggest mistake folks have is measuring all by their own dissonance. They are not all adults. An adult is aware of that...

Expand full comment
Sigmundr Orlandeau's avatar

I see a lot of allegations and projection but zero evidence.

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

evidence of what??? why so vague??? Arist...the start to the worlds very own twist. Aristotle and his box of reasoning we are all trying to think out of; not realizing it is a containment system that auto directs us into a box; the same reason we use to try and think our way out...the matrix is not what it created...

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

First define the word; appears vertical, seems paralleled...

Expand full comment
Doc Ellis 124's avatar

Substack's Nazi Problem

By Bretigne Shaffer

http://tinyurl.com/2n9sxz47

37 for unlimited speech or writing

by Doc Ellis 124

don't look at what you don't like

http://tinyurl.com/2xym8a7e

for the record, I favor unlimited speech or writing. period. I am responsible for reading or not other folks’ comments or content. I am responsible for understanding or not what other folks write. I am responsible for reading, skimming, or skipping what other folks write.

if staff folks have a question of whether or not to moderate, don’t moderate.

to folks who demand comment or content moderation: in my opinion, generally, you can probably do best by going home to your maker through putting yourself to sleep.

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

yes you are...but what do those personal reflected words mean to the receiver who now understands what you wrote; that you clearly don't...

Expand full comment
Doc Ellis 124's avatar

@ Kevin

Yes I am what?

What does the gibberish that you wrote following the words "yes you are" mean?

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

Doc good point; I have no idea what I was reflecting on. I believe my messages were being crossed inside my brain "cell"(s). I agree with what you wrote; I do not agree with preventing people from expression; I do however feel that some of the comments are made from sick minds that should be removed. An example would be this filth we see pushed on children in schools; this pervert crt crap...although it is a long drawn out reality to our slow manipulation, we all woke to it when they blatantly came after the children. I would stop that...I would end that...if anyone would feel that blocking minds from thinking their opinion of reality is reality is wrong...meet you outside is my attitude for the perverts who would; but that is just me and my free speech...and I love it...more so, the do on to others part...)))

Expand full comment
Doc Ellis 124's avatar

@ Kevin

I get brain farts from time to time

I understand you to mean: "yes you are" [responsible for reading or not other folks’ comments or content; responsible for understanding or not what other folks write; responsible for reading, skimming, or skipping what other folks write.]

I also think you want to say [However: think of the emotional impact that some words can have on some recipients.]

noted

Expand full comment
JB's avatar

"Free speech for me but not for thee!"

You guys lack principles.

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

That is a leap of faith right over reasons cliff...we fight for principles and think to void that which is not...question is does that sound rational???

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

ok then take away their power; they control the vote; they control the vote by way of controlling how you vote; they will not allow you to vote against the system only for one of their candidates.

Expand full comment
Martin - Vetenskapliga partiet's avatar

You would vote in order to evolve the system into a better system. That is allowed.

Expand full comment
Kevin's avatar

In essence demand an actual democracy; we have never had one of them...western but that is not the same...

Expand full comment
Martin - Vetenskapliga partiet's avatar

You never had it, because you never organized it, and never voted for it.

Expand full comment
Ellen MHa's avatar

Thank you for the heads up. I will share as well.

Expand full comment